Skip to content

LETTER: Rezoning annexed land 'raises serious concerns'

Should annexation go ahead, letter writer worries that bringing industry to that area of Oro-Medonte could have 'long-term implications'
11132023barrielandrequestmap
This map shows three areas of Springwater Township (in red) where the City of Barrie would like to extend its municipal boundary, as well as in Oro-Medonte Township (highlighted in orange).

BarrieToday welcomes letters to the editor at [email protected] or via the website. Please include your full name, daytime phone number and address (for verification of authorship, not publication). The following letter is in relation to 'Talk it out: Oro-Medonte prepares for provincial facilitator meeting,' published May 7.

I am writing to shed light on a matter of great importance to the residents of Barrie Ward 1 and Oro-Medonte: the City of Barrie’s proposal to annex 2,200 acres along Penetanguishene Road for the development of an industrial park.

At present, the Township of Oro-Medonte has taken the proactive step of involving a provincial land and development facilitator to address this important issue.

This collaborative approach, which hopefully will include the municipalities of Barrie, Simcoe County and Springwater, aims to find a mutually beneficial solution to the proposed annexation. It’s crucial to note that this process is voluntary, emphasizing the commitment of all parties involved to reach a fair resolution.

The prospect of rezoning this land for industrial use raises serious concerns. Such a designation would permit the establishment of various heavy industries, including those involved in detergent manufacturing, chemical processing and brewery operations. Placing these facilities in close proximity to a sizable residential area along Penetanguishene Road would undoubtedly have adverse effects.

Studies consistently show that industrial activities generate noise, pollution, increased traffic, and light emissions, all of which are detrimental to the quality of life in residential neighbourhoods. Moreover, there’s substantial evidence indicating that such developments can lead to decreased property values and hinder future real estate transactions.

Furthermore, a significant portion of the land earmarked for annexation is environmentally sensitive, featuring vital wetlands and watersheds. The proximity of these ecosystems to Lake Simcoe heightens the risk of detrimental runoff, threatening the ecological balance of our cherished natural resources.

In light of these concerns, it’s imperative that we carefully consider the long-term implications of the proposed annexation.

While economic development is undoubtedly essential, it must not come at the expense of our residents’ well-being or the integrity of our environment.

I urge all stakeholders to prioritize sustainable growth and equitable solutions that safeguard both our community’s interests and our natural heritage.

Jane Voorheis
Oro-Medonte